IAFNS is committed to sharing the results of the research we support, regardless of the outcomes. Our publications undergo stringent peer-review by qualified experts prior to publication and include disclosure of all sources of funding.
Higher Protein Intake During Caloric Restriction Improves Diet Quality and Attenuates Loss of Lean Body Mass
Obesity, 2022
Trends in Food Allergy Research, Regulations and Patient Care
Nutrition Today, 2022
Recent research on food allergies is summarized as well as the regulatory context for allergens. Patient care options are outlined as well as helpful tips for nutritionists concerned about addressing and managing food allergies with their clients.
Read more about Trends in Food Allergy Research, Regulations and Patient Care
PUFA ω-3 and ω-6 Biomarkers and Sleep: A Pooled Analysis of Cohort Studies on Behalf of the Fatty Acids and Outcomes Research Consortium (FORCE)
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2022
In a pooling analysis of 12 studies from 5 countries, higher blood/tissue concentrations of very long chain omega-3 fatty acids (EPA + DPA + DHA and DHA alone) were associated with lower odds of long sleep duration. These findings highlight the importance of continued study of n-3 PUFAs given the public health implications of poor sleep.
Compendium of Sodium Reduction Strategies in Foods: A Scoping Review
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2022
It has been suggested that reducing sodium in the food supply may be the most appropriate solution. The aim of this scoping review was to establish what sodium reduction strategies are effective in maintaining acceptable sensory qualities for various food industry applications.
Read more about Compendium of Sodium Reduction Strategies in Foods: A Scoping Review
Commercial Devices Provide Estimates of Energy Balance with Varying Degrees of Validity in Free-Living Adults
The Journal of Nutrition, 2022
Interest in improving accuracy, and replacing self-reports with passive tools when estimating energy balance (EB) using intake (EI), storage (ES) and expenditure (EE)) has led to wide use of commercial devices e.g. Fitbits. A study with free-living adults looked at repeatability, and measurement error of these devices and showed varying degrees of validity when used to estimate EB compared to gold-standard techniques, with EE measures being the most robust and ES the poorest.